Practice standard · Arman Naeini
How Embark works with evidence.
A scientific answer is not simply an answer with references. The question, method, strength of evidence and uncertainty all need to remain visible.
1. Define the decision before searching
A broad topic can generate a large volume of information without answering the question that matters. We first define the population, context, decision and intended use of the answer.
2. Match the method to the question
A focused evidence brief is not presented as a systematic review. Before work begins, we agree on the scope, sources, depth and limitations of the review.
3. Separate evidence from inference
Published findings, professional interpretation and a recommendation are not the same thing. We identify which claims are directly supported, which are reasoned inferences and which remain hypotheses.
4. Keep uncertainty visible
Conflicting studies, weak measurement, limited populations and missing data do not disappear because a decision is needed. Uncertainty is stated in proportion to its importance.
5. Translate without overstating
Evidence becomes useful when its practical implications are clear. Translation should not turn an association into causation, a group average into certainty about an individual, or a preliminary finding into established fact.
Publication labels matter. An evidence brief, practice analysis, conceptual paper and original empirical study are different outputs. Embark labels each according to what was actually done.